(This paper was presented at 2006 Architectural Engineering Conference on March
30, 2006, Omaha, Nebraska) Functional Isolation Concept in Curtain Wall Design
Abstract The primary purpose of a curtain wall system is to protect the building interior
against the exterior natural phenomena such as sun exposure, temperature
changes, earthquake, rain, and wind. This protection can be separated into two
major categories, namely structural safety and interior environmental control.
The structural safety problems include failures of wall component, wall facing material, and
fasteners. The interior environmental control problems include excessive energy
loss, noise control, mold growth, interior water condensation, and water
leakage. It is essential to maintain this protection for the life of the
building ideally without periodic repairs or total renovation. Unfortunately
experience indicated that the life of a curtain wall system can not outlive the
building life due to complicated and intertwined multiple functional
requirements of a curtain wall system. For example, sealing functional failure
due to sun exposure and/or sealant line stress fatigue caused by various
structural movements of wall components and building frame (such as thermal
expansion or contraction, wind load deflection or rotation, dead load
deflection, inter-floor live load deflection, and interfloor story drift) could
produce a chain of functional failures, for example, water leakage leading to
wetting of insulation material (energy loss) or mold growth (sick air building)
or rusting of connection system leading to structural failure. The maintenance
and renovation cost of the curtain wall system has a very significant impact on
the life-cycle cost of the building. This cost impact can only be evaluated if
the durability of all curtain wall functions can be determined. Unfortunately,
little has been done in this regard due to the complexity of the intertwined
curtain wall functions. This paper highlights the possibility of using
Functional Isolation Concept (FIC) in designing a curtain wall system to greatly
reduce the interferences among the various curtain wall functions. Continuing
development of FIC in the future may lead to a reliable method of evaluating the
cost impact of a curtain wall system on the life-cycle cost of a building.
Introduction In order to understand the functions required for a curtain wall (CW) to perform
and how to prevent the intertwined functional interferences, the following
logical steps are presented.
1. Identification of basic CW components. 2. Identification of CW performance functions. 3. Identification of causes affecting CW performance functions. 4. Identification of effects due to causes. 5. Functional Isolation Concept (FIC). 6. Application of Functional Isolation Concept.
Identification of Basic Curtain Wall Components The basic CW components include the following items.
1. A CW support system (CWSS). 2. A support connection system (SCS) securing CWSS to the edge of building
floor. 3. A facing panel system (FPS) consisting of one or more facing materials. 4. A panel connection system (PCS) securing FPS to CWSS. 5. A weather sealing system including the following options.
a. Single sealing system (SSS) sealing all FPS joints. b. Double sealing system (DSS) utilizing the following sealing components.
(1) A joint weather sealing system (JWSS) between FPS and CWSS.
(2) A panel weather sealing system (PWSS) around and between panel edges of FPS.
(3) A water drainage system (WDS) for draining partially infiltrated water between JWSS and PWSS.
Identification of Curtain Wall Performance Functions
1. Structural Integrity
a. PF-1: Safety against stress fatigue in annual loading cycles in combination
with dead load. b. PF-2: Safety against extreme loads in combination with dead load (e.g. 50-
yr recurrence interval wind and seismic loads).
2. Sealing Integrity
a. PF-3: Air and water-tightness after various annual load cycles. b. PF-4: Air and water-tightness after spandrel beam deflection cycles
(including dead load strain creep and live floor load deflection) in building
service condition. c. PF-5: Water-tightness at the maximum design inter-floor deflection. d. PF-6: Water-tightness in extreme rainstorm (e.g. 50-yr recurrence
interval). e. PF-7: Air and water-tightness after extreme seismic event (e.g. 50-yr
recurrence interval).
3. Thermal Insulation Integrity For a given thermal insulation design, the aging effect on the insulation
material
normally has a minor impact on the thermal insulation integrity. The major
impact
on the thermal insulation integrity is normally due to excessive air leakage
and/or
water leakage (wetting of insulation material). Therefore, ¡§thermal insulation
integrity¡¨ can be considered to go hand-in-hand with ¡§sealing integrity¡¨.
4. Performance Functions excluded from the scope of this paper: aesthetic
durability
and sound insulation.
Identification of Causes Affecting Curtain Wall Performance Functions
Except the aging effect on material, the causes affecting curtain wall functions
can be categorized into the following two groups.
1. Direct Causes include the following items.
C-1: Wind Load. C-2: Seismic Load. C-3: Thermal Load. C-4: Dead Load.
2. Indirect Causes include the following items.
C-5: Spandrel Beam Deflection. C-6: Story Drift. C-7: Differential Thermal Load between Curtain Wall and Building Frame.
Identification of Effects due to Causes In the following list of effects, the preceding * indicates that the effect is
significantly
reduced or almost eliminated by the application of FIC presented in the last
section of
this paper.
1. Effects due to Direct Causes
E-1: Bending/shear stresses and deflections on facing pane, sub-frame, and support frame caused by wind load (C-1). *E-2: Edge compressive or tensile stresses on facing pane, sub-frame, and
support frame due to thermal load (C-3). E-3: Edge compressive or tensile stresses on facing pane due to dead load (C-4). *E-4: Edge compressive or tensile stresses on facing pane due to seismic load (C-2). *E-5: Loosening of fasteners due to repeated cycles of tensile or shear stresses
on fasteners caused by dynamic wind load (C-1). E-6: Tensile or shear stresses on fasteners caused by dead load (C-4). E-7: Tensile or shear stresses on fasteners caused by seismic load (C-2). E-8: Sealant line stresses (tensile, compressive, and shear) caused by wind load (C-1). *E-9: Sealant line stresses (tensile, compressive, and shear) caused by dead
load (C-4). *E-10: Sealant line stresses (tensile, compressive, and shear) caused by seismic load (C-2). *E-11: Sealant line stresses (tensile, compressive, and shear) between two adjacent facing panes caused by thermal load (C-3).
2. Effects due to Indirect Causes
*E-12: Edge compressive or tensile stresses on facing pane due to spandrel beam deflection (C-5) caused by live load on the floor. *E-13: Edge compressive or tensile stresses on facing pane due to spandrel beam deflection (C-5) caused by column shortening due to strain creep in column material (e.g. concrete). *E-14: Edge compressive or tensile stresses on facing pane due to spandrel beam deflection (C-5) caused by strain creep in beam material (e.g. composite beam) due to dead load and/or long term live load. *E-15: Edge compressive or tensile stresses on facing pane due to differential thermal expansion or contraction (C-7) between curtain wall and building frames. *E-16: Diagonal compression and tension forces on facing pane due to inter-floor story drift (C-6) caused by wind load or seismic load. *E-17: Sealant line stresses due to spandrel beam deflection (C-5) caused by
live load on the floor. *E-18: Sealant line stresses due to spandrel beam deflection (C-5) caused by column shortening due to strain creep in column material (e.g. concrete). *E-19: Sealant line stresses due to story drift (C-6) caused by wind or seismic load. *E-20: Sealant line stresses due to spandrel beam deflection (C-5) caused by strain creep in beam material (e.g. composite beam) due to floor dead load
and/or long term floor live load. *E-21: Sealant line stresses due to differential thermal expansion or
contraction (C-7) between curtain wall and building frames. *E-22: Compressive or tensile stresses on sub-frame and support frame due to spandrel beam deflection (C-5) caused by live load on the floor. *E-23: Compressive or tensile stresses on sub-frame and support frame due to spandrel beam deflection (C-5) caused by column shortening due to strain creep in column material (e.g. concrete). *E-24: Compressive or tensile stresses on sub-frame and support frame due to spandrel beam deflection (C-5) caused by strain creep in beam material (e.g. composite beam) due to floor dead load and/or long term floor live load. *E-25: Compressive or tensile stresses on sub-frame and support frame due to differential thermal expansion or contraction (C-7) between curtain wall and building frames. E-26: Lateral bending on sub-frame and support frame due to inter-floor story drift (C-6) caused by wind load or seismic load.
Functional Isolation Concept (FIC) The causes and effects on all curtain wall performance functions are summarized
in the following table.
TABLE 1: List of Functions, Effects, Causes
|
Function |
Effects |
Causes |
| PF-1 |
E-1, *E-5 |
C-1 |
| |
E-3, E-6 |
C-4 |
| |
*E-4, E-7 |
C-2 |
| |
*E-2 |
C-3 |
| |
*E-12, *E-13, *E-14, *E-22, *E-23, *E-24 |
C-5 |
| |
*E-16, E-26 |
C-6 |
| |
*E-15, *E-25 |
C-7 |
|
PF-2 |
E-1, *E-5 |
C-1 |
| |
E-3, E-6 |
C-4 |
| |
*E-4, E-7 |
C-2 |
| |
*E-2 |
C-3 |
| |
*E-12, *E-13, *E-14, *E-22, *E-23, *E-24 |
C-5 |
| |
*E-16, E-26 |
C-6 |
| |
*E-15, E-25 |
C-7 |
|
PF-3 |
E-8 |
C-1 |
| |
*E-9 |
C-4 |
| |
*E-10 |
C-2 |
| |
*E-11 |
C-3 |
| |
*E-19 |
C-6 |
|
PF-4, PF-5 |
*E-17 |
C-5 |
|
PF-6 |
E-8 |
C-1 |
| |
*E-19 |
C-6 |
|
PF-7 |
*E-10 |
C-1 |
| |
*E-19 |
C-6 |
It can be seen from the above table, one cause produces multiple effects on
multiple
functions. The degradation of one performance function often leads to the
degradation of
other performance function or functions. To obtain durable performance
functions, it
becomes apparent that it is desirable to isolate the function or functions of
each curtain
wall components (FIC). In the above table, the preceding * on the effect
indicates that the
effect is significantly reduced or near eliminated after the application of FIC
as presented
as follows. The possibilities of FIC are discussed as follows.
As shown in TABLE 1, a single cause often produces multiple effects on multiple
structural components and elements between components. To reduce the intertwined
effects, the concept is to design the system with either insignificant or no
relative
movement between two components or stress-free movement between two components.
This concept leads to the following FICs.
FIC-1: Each facing pane must be unitized with perimeter supporting panel frame
and weather seals in between. (i.e. insignificant or no relative movement
between
facing pane and panel frame). FIC-2: The panel frame must be separated from CWSS to allow the possibility of
stress-free relative lateral movement in between to eliminate E-16 and E-19. FIC-3: Open panel joints must be provided to allow the possibility of
stress-free
relative movement between two adjacent panels to eliminate E-2, E-3, E-4, E-9,
E-10, E-11, E-15, E-21, and E-25.
Past experiences indicated that a major cause of degradation of sealing
integrity
could be attributed to E-5. Therefore, it is desirable to eliminate E-5 using
the following
concept. FIC-4: Use mechanical engagement between panel frame and supporting mullion
for transferring wind load into the mullion. Also, use mechanical engagement for
connecting the horizontal panel frame to the vertical panel frame. The panel
fasteners are used for supporting the panel weight only, therefore, E-5 can be
eliminated.
The performance functions PF-3 to PF-7 (air and/or water tightness) deals with
the interior environmental condition of daily concern in addition to the 50-year
recurrence interval rainstorm condition. The impact of air leakage is the loss
of energy
which is a daily operational concern and is often more tolerable than the water
leakage
problem due to the fact that air leakage normally constitutes a small percentage
of the
total energy loss of the building. The water leakage is an occasional problem
(i.e. windy
rainstorm condition), however, it has very low tolerance level. Therefore, the
durability
of water-tightness performance is vitally important to the building owner. It is
well
known that a critical seal is defined as a seal being used to seal off both air
and water or
water with a water head (e.g. bottom of a gutter). To prevent water leakage, the
critical
seal must be perfect. However, adequate durability of the critical seal is
highly questionable due to the effect of various structural movements of curtain wall
components and the aging effect on the sealant material. Therefore, the
following FICs
are formed to secure durable PF-3 to PF-7.
FIC-5: To eliminate the critical seals, isolate the air sealing function from
the
water sealing function by using two independent types of sealant lines, namely,
water seal lines with pressure equalized joint air space behind it and air seal
lines
with dry pressure equalized joint air space in front of it. FIC-6: Isolate air entry from water entry into the pressure equalized joint air
space
using a rain screen member with hidden air entry gap or holes. FIC-7: In the process of air entry, some incidental water can be flown over the
rain screen member, therefore, it is necessary to isolate the front section of
the
pressure equalized joint cavity to create a gutter space behind the rain screen
member. To eliminate the water head problem, use a gutter connected to a
vertical
groove without gutter end dams for instantaneous drainage. FIC-8: Isolate the water drainage area from a dry section in the pressure
equalized
joint cavity by providing a water seal line behind the water drainage area and
in
front of the air seal line.
The curtain wall is supported on the edge of each floor slab or spandrel beam.
The
spandrel beam deflection (same as floor slab edge deflection) will cause the
curtain wall
joints to move accordingly. In the modern building design, the spandrel beam is
commonly designed for a maximum live load deflection of ¾¡¨. It is difficult to
maintain
the sealing properties if the curtain wall joints are subjected to repeated
joint movements
of ¾¡¨ (problem with PF-4). In addition, rainstorm can happen at the maximum
spandrel
beam deflection of ¾¡¨ and maintaining the water tightness at ¾¡¨ curtain wall
joint
movement is extremely difficult (problem with PF-5). To solve this
water-tightness
problem for building in-service condition and durable performance, the following
FIC is
required.
FIC-9: Isolate the maximum curtain wall joint movement from the maximum
spandrel beam deflection such that the maximum curtain wall joint movement is
within the tolerable range for maintaining PF-4 and PF-5.
In order to significantly reduce the effects of C-6, the following two FICs are
possible. FIC-10: Isolate the lateral floor displacement from the support connection
system
(SCS) by providing laterally sliding joint between the connecting part on the
slab
and the connecting part on the mullion such that inter-floor story drift will
not
cause the mullion to tilt to one side. This FIC has been used in Point-Supported
Glass system and is generally considered to be expensive. FIC-11: Use fixed SCS and in conjunction with FIC-2, isolate the tilting
movement of mullion from the movement of the panel frame such that inter-floor
story drift can be absorbed by inter-panel drifts with little or no distortion
to the panel frames. In order to maintain the sealing integrity in the application of
this
FIC, the following four FICs are required. FIC-11A: The top panel frame must be fastened to the mullion to support the dead
weight and the bottom panel joint must be a laterally sliding joint. FIC-11B: A lateral free gap must be provided between the panel jamb frame and
the mullion to allow stress-free panel drifting. FIC-11C: At the maximum panel drift position, the air seal line between the
panel
frame and the mullion must be maintained by providing adequate contacting
surface in between. FIC-11D: Non-tearing type of sealant material (e.g. one-sided adhesive foam
tape) must be used in the panel joints and in the joint between the panel jamb
frame and the mullion to allow relative component movement without sealant line
distortion or stress.
Application of Functional Isolation Concept A curtain wall system known as Airloop System1 is the result of the application
of
the FICs presented in this paper. With reference to the attached figures, the
applications of FICs are summarized in TABLE 2 below.
TABLE 2: Applications of FICs
|
FIG. |
Applications |
Results |
| 1 |
Each panel is unitized. |
FIC-1 |
| 2 & 3 |
P.S.F., P.H.F. and P.J.F. are separated from M. |
FIC-2 |
| 2 & 3 |
Both horizontal & vertical panel joints are open. |
FIC-3 |
| 2 |
Mechanical engagement between P.S.F. & P.H..F.
|
FIC-4 |
| 3 |
Mechanical engagement between P.J.F. & M at M.W.S. |
|
| N.S.
|
Corner clips to connect P.S.F. and P.H.F. to P.J.F. |
|
| 2 & 3 |
Panel frame corners are miter-matched to form P.A. with A.H.
on P.S.F. to allow pressure equalization of P.A. |
FIC-5 |
| |
P.A.S. is separated from P.W.S. by P.A. |
|
| |
J.A.S. is separated from J.W.S. by J.A. |
|
| 2 & 3 |
R.S. with W.G. and M.H. with W.G. to stop water entry |
FIC-6 |
| 2 & 3 |
G. on FIG. 2 ended at V.G. on FIG. 3 |
FIC-7 |
| 2 & 3 |
J.W.S. in front of J.A.S and M.W.S. in front of M.A.S. |
FIC-8 |
| 4 |
SPACE 1 is much smaller than SPACE 2. |
FIC-9 |
| 2 |
P.H.F. is screwed to M and no fastener on P.S.F. |
FIC-11A |
| 3 |
Free space is provided between P.J.F. and M.H.
|
FIC-11B |
| 3 |
P.J.F. has a wide contacting surface with M.A.S.
|
FIC-11C |
| 2 & 3 |
Use one sided adhesive foam tape for J.A.S., J.W.S., M.A.S.
and M.W.S. |
FIC-11D |
It can be seen from TABLE 2 that the FICs discussed in this paper have been
incorporated into the Airloop System resulting in drastically reduced number of
affecting
parameters in TABLE 1 (i.e. eliminating those preceded with *). The durability
of curtain
wall functions is greatly enhanced.
Final Notes 1. The most important issue is the durability of curtain wall performance
functions.
However, the current curtain wall test methods are inadequate to evaluate the
performance durability issue 2,3. Research efforts are needed to develop new
practical and economically feasible test method.
2. All system designs need the proper executions of quality control procedures
in
fabrication and erection to achieve the intended design functions. However, the
effectiveness of the quality control is often a function of the design feature.
For
example, it is very difficult to execute an effective quality control on a
system
requiring critical seals since the degree of perfection on a seal can¡¦t be
judged by
eye inspection. On the other hand, it is very easy to execute an effective
quality
control by eye inspection on a system without critical seal.
3. For water leakage problem, any system with quality control errors would
likely to
leak in the first annual weather cycle regardless of how good the design is.
When
the method of rating curtain wall systems has been developed based on the
durability issue, the following logical insurance policy is recommended.
(1) As in usual practice, the insurance premium is a function of the rating.
(2) High Self-Insured Retention on the first year for all systems to encourage
proper execution of quality control.
4. Once curtain walls can be rated based on the durability of performance
functions,
the lifetime cost including maintenance cost can be confidently evaluated in the
system selection process. This will be a huge direct benefit to the building
owner.
List of References 1. Ting, R., ¡§Solutions to Curtain Wall Problems Using Airloop System¡¨, 2001
International Conference on Building Envelope Systems and Technologies,
Ottawa, Canada. Proceedings Vol. 2, Page 257. 2. Ting, R., ¡§Rating Curtain Walls on Performance¡¨, The Construction Specifier,
March, 2005. 3. Ting, R., ¡§Rethinking Curtain Wall Ratings¡¨, Construction Canada, September,
2005.
List of Terminologies CW = Curtain Wall. CWSS = Curtain Wall Support System. DSS = Double Sealing System. FIC = Functional Isolation Concept. FPS = Facing Panel System. JWSS = Joint Weather Sealing System. PCS = Panel Connection System. PWSS = Panel Weather Sealing System. SCS = Support Connection System. SSS = Single Sealing System. WDS = Water Drainage System. |